wifivef.blogg.se

Remux vs obfucate
Remux vs obfucate












remux vs obfucate
  1. #Remux vs obfucate 1080p
  2. #Remux vs obfucate mp4

Using playback correction just confimed my suspicion.

#Remux vs obfucate mp4

You would keep your MP4 in Direct Play and only the subtitles would be converted from subrip->webvtt and delivered. But rather than wait for them to fix it we have to work around it. It might be a bug on Roku they have yet to fix. We can extract the subtitles and send them as WebVTT rather than let the Roku player think they are chapter points and strip them and possibly do odd behavior during playback. If I download a DTS-HD encode, is the audio quality still compressed (My understanding is that it's not) 3. Is there a loss in pixel density in encodes compared to remux Both look the same.

#Remux vs obfucate 1080p

Without you having to do it or wait for the player to respawn with the new play method. Remuxes are 1920x1080p and 1080p encodes are actually 1920x800p, though they both have the black bars. We can train the capabilities to know this and then present them as if you had pressed playback correction once. The Roku is "not supposed to" have captions in MP4 because of the confusion. Still does.Įvery other device might support them. In what sense "not supposed to"? What about MPEG-4 Part 17 "timed text", approved in 2005? I see how we can get the captons on Roku working for Live TV too via EIA-708 container or EIA-608 itself. But I know that SUBRIP will get munged on Roku because it doesn't understand they are truly SRT. Haven't you ever seen it say SRT on one then say SUBRIP on some other one.

remux vs obfucate

To be clear, with enough time and effort, almost all code can be reverse engineered. While the process may modify actual method instructions or metadata, it does not alter the output of the program. We show them verbatim on the Roku how Emby presents them to the application. Code Obfuscation is the process of modifying an executable so that it is no longer useful to a hacker but remains fully functional. :///questions/6274768/ffmpeg-remux-without-decode-encode. semiuseless: I suspect 30 lines of code isnt going to be hidden that well in C, either. :///questions/1250779/python-class-vs-module-attributes. If you have code that valuable, convert it to C, or keep it on a server. The two are listed individually on the subtitles presented by Emby. There is no effective way to obfuscate python such that it can not be trivially converted back to human readable. If it didn't exist why is it there? I am not saying these things to confuse you. When it says SUBRIP and believe me it does you will see it say this it might get them wrong on the Roku.Īsk why it says SUBRIP because it does. When you see SRT the Roku will be able to show those correctly. Please see my many responses about your posts. Selecting between Remix or Next.js is an endless debate among developers.














Remux vs obfucate